Skip to content
HarborSpot

The Venezuelan Crisis Could Now Define Trump's Political Legacy - as well as the United States' Place in the Global Order

In the wake of executing a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump now appears to be entering the nation-building business.

In a remarkable news conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the president announced that US military forces had effectively captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight raid in Caracas.

Trump then indicated that a delegation comprising Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, working with Venezuelans, would be taking control of the embattled nation.

"We are going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and careful transition," he said.

What precisely "running the country" entails is unclear, but the pledge signifies an dramatic policy reversal for the president, full of contradictions and formidable challenges.

A president who ran on opposing "forever wars", who sharply criticised past US efforts at regime change and who vowed to implement an "America first" foreign policy is now gambling his presidency on successfully revitalizing a South American nation whose economic system is collapsed and whose governmental stability has been undermined by decades of dictatorship.

Yet, Trump was relentlessly optimistic.

He claimed his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this will be no different. He pledged to recruit American energy companies to rebuild Venezuela's crumbling production infrastructure, supplying funds for the American rebuilding project and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He left open the possibility of sending American soldiers to Venezuela to advance these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to remember the words of one of the American architects of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you break it, you own it."

A Shift in Foreign Policy

The US has altered Venezuela's destiny – for better or worse.

Trump came to power nearly a year ago pledging to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has shown that he is more than willing to use military force internationally.

In the past week, he ordered air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted nuclear facilities in Iran, alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, militias in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

Unlike past operations, which have mostly involved missiles and warplanes that reduce the exposure of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela operation – and his commitments to the fate of that nation – are markedly distinct.

His objective, he said during his briefing, is to "restore Venezuela's greatness."

Response at Home and Abroad

That twist on Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - mantra could be difficult for some of Trump's followers to digest.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump loyalist who broke with the president after accusing him of abandoning his political base, was swift to denounce the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's endless use of force and backing for foreign wars is justified because we are forced to finance it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another prominent Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, compared the legal justification for Maduro's arrest – on arms and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to reclaim confiscated US oil and halt fentanyl production.

The majority of Republican lawmakers rallied behind the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the military action against a "illegitimate government" as "firm and warranted".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his appearance, the president argued the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" priorities because it guaranteed US hemispheric security and provided a steady source of oil.

He revived the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American foreign policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Trump Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US supremacy in the Western Hemisphere will never be challenged again."

The goal of the new US security policy, he said, was to "safeguard trade, land and assets that are fundamental to our national security." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's choice to apprehend Maduro will raise larger questions in international relations, however, and impact American relations with the world's other significant military powers.

The Chinese government issued a statement voicing surprise and denouncing what it said was a reckless attack on a sovereign nation.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar condemnations of Russia following its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is trying to mediate a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has often seemed to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, expressed worry about the message Trump's actions might send.

"My primary concern is now Russia will use this to excuse their illegal and brutal operations against Ukraine, or China to justify an attack of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic opponents were more direct.

"America should not be managing other countries for any purpose," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have learned by now not to get entangled in perpetual conflicts and regime change missions that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a criminal and a dictator with a record of human rights abuses. But he condemned Trump's choice not to consult with congressional leaders prior to initiating the attack.

"Donald Trump has the legal duty to abide by the law and protect democratic norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First demands."

Trump, in his remarks, explained that he opted not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "disclose" details of the operation before the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That mission was a success – with no American deaths and minimal damage to US equipment. Trump, with his typical bravado, portrayed the operation as a "spectacular assault" and "among the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American military might and competency in US history."

Now he is betting his legacy on that success enduring, as the US says it will assume responsibility for running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that actually means is unclear. He and his team must rebuild a nation that has been in turmoil for years while calming a hemisphere that is sure to be apprehensive of what Trump's foreign policy has in store for them.

About the author

Sarah Davis

Helena is a seasoned sailor and maritime historian who loves sharing stories from the waterways.

HarborSpot

Type to search articles.